"Yu said explosion" argument, committed four errors

Abstract: The "Big Bang" is neither absolute nor relative to the universe the universe, in philosophy is something that does not exist. A hypothesis must have the facts and scientific theory two conditions. "Explosion said the word" pure, respectively, the Hubble redshift observations, cosmological constant repulsive force is greater than gravity, gravity is less than the fact that the three things to do, but they are not facts, but also to do with the Doppler principle of scientific theory, but it is not yet proven in the far space, "said Yu explosion" body that is a scientific theory, even the hypothesis is not only double nonsense.

Keywords:: does not exist a third universe, the cosmological constant repulsive force, hypothesis, double nonsense

First, both the universe and the "third space"

Marxist philosophy holds that the universe in two ways: absolute and relative. Absolute universe is unique and infinite, of which there are numerous relative to the universe. Absolutely no cosmic birth and death, nothing can generate it, it does not will be eliminated. relatively limited universe, there is birth and death, has generated its universe, the universe is generated relative to its universe. relative to the universe once eliminated, its time behind There must be another universe, it must have the original space, another universe . In addition there is no third universe.

Where mankind on the planet today, the largest scientific understanding of the universe, the earth is the center, 140 million light years for the radius of the spherical objects. It as a relative universe, in time before a universe generated by it in space by its produced around the universe.

"Science largest universe" before the universe, what, around the universe, what, up to the science to understand. Recognized is recognized, not recognized to be left to later get to know, science can only say that has not recognized before the universe and the surrounding universe, can not say no before the universe, not around the universe.

"Word explosion, said," claimed by the Big Bang created a "big bang." This shows that "Big Bang" is animate. Lives so shall destroy, then it is a birth and death of the relative universe. But it is also produced in the "day without yesterday", [1] that it is not generated in the time before the universe. it is produced in the singularity, singularity "of zero surface of zero volume" [2], which says there is no room minch point , no space is equivalent to no time, not space and time than the universe. is not what the universe is not around the universe, that it is not generated in the space around the universe. Thus it is not relative to the universe. In this way, "Big Bang" to only energy is neither absolute nor relative to the universe the universe does not exist in a third universe.

"Yu said explosive" tell "Big Bang" and "the largest space science," the difference in position is on the left or right, in time, before or later in their, in fact, the "Big Bang "equivalent to" the largest scientific universe ". so put" maximum cosmic science "also ended up either not produced a time before its universe, and did not produce its space next to the universe and the universe is not absolute The third universe.

"Yu explosion that" the very beginning that do not exist on the philosophy established as the third space "too Bang", which was established in science can it?

Second, the rules of scientific Research

Engels said: "As long as the natural sciences in mind, it is a form of development hypothesis." [3] hypothesis is based on existing facts and make reasoned application of scientific theory. A reasoned basis for the absence of the two in any one , can not into it as hypothesis.

Factual, scientific theory, a combination of both, presumably made as hypotheses.

Have the facts, but no scientific theory, The one, presumably made as nonsense.

Scientific theories, but no facts, The one, presumably made is nonsense.

No facts, and no scientific theory, the two missing two, presumably made as double nonsense.

Hypothesis must be confirmed by the practice to become a scientific theory, otherwise stay away. This is the Marxist philosophy, "Practice is the sole criterion for testing truth," the principle in the field of implementation science. Even in the absence of Marxism as the guiding ideology of the state , as long as it is for scientific Research, it must follow this rule.

Hypothesis proved below talk about issues, talk about, "said Yu explosion" hypothesis can not be a problem.


Third, even the space without a license in the Doppler principle, the Hubble observations found in the blue shift

Earlier, "Hubble," said all was far from the galaxy redshift space, it is a fact. Based on scientific theory of the Doppler principle, galaxies are far away from the Earth in space. Have the facts of scientific theory, the "word explosion that" into a hypothesis.

Hubble later discovered that there are blue-shifted, non-red non-blue shift, and even can not explain "both red and blue shift." There is a blue shift is enough to negate the big bang the universe was formed, so the Hubble is not then the "explosion Yu said," the factual basis. Meanwhile, the Doppler principle is the scientific theory in the near-space, space in the far proved to be "at least in the current technical condition is impossible", [4] Therefore, Doppler Le principle is no longer "Yu explosion that" the scientific theory. neither the facts nor scientific theories, both missing the second, as presumably the "word explosion, said," just a double nonsense.

Links to Free Download Center http://www.hi138.com four papers, Einstein negative "cosmological constant"

In 1919, Einstein began to take into account the infinite universe has infinite substance, will have infinite gravity. It will happen sooner or later, the role of gravity, making the universe, eventually all the material together to form a unique bulk material (referred to as the "collapse"). So Einstein conceived Repulsion. repulsion and gravitational effects will get a "no maintenance of the universe eventually collapse," the results. Einstein led to this result the number of things as " cosmological constant, "is included within the repulsive force, and gravity play a role in it. This repulsion there? in the number of how calculated? Einstein solved. years later, Einstein announced that he had to look for the" cosmological constant " behavior, is his "life is the most stupid mistake."
philosophy holds that the universe does not collapse to the absolute. In the absolute universe, other than the gravitational repulsion of the total = the total. Relative to the universe will not collapse because of internal gravity and because the watertight compartment fire can not be separated from the external magnetic power across the universe gravity within it. If the collapse of the relative universe, must be another reason.


Five, too explosions and black holes are also double nonsense

Lemaitre believed that the universe arises "not the day yesterday," a "primitive atom", resulting "explosion, said Yu." Even if the original atom is a universe, but it is not the first time is not relative to the universe the universe, it is not absolutely universal, so it does not exist. he published in 1927 that if the repulsive cosmological constant slightly more than gravity, the universe will begin to expand. Notice the "if" word, it shows " repulsive gravitational universe will inflate more than "just Lemaitre's a subjective imagination, not a scientific theory. In this way, Lemaitre did not exist a" primitive atom "and the subjective act of" gravitational repulsion over expansion of the universe will "make The "big bang" hypothesis is both missing the second, only a double nonsense.

And Lemaitre Instead, Penrose considers that since the action of gravity, the density of cosmic matter may fall into a huge area, from which even light can not be issued to, and this is a black hole. Since the material can be attributed to that all the universe, then this reverse the process, it can emit all that material universe. obtained in this way, "Yu said explosion." Notice the "may" and "upside down" two key words. "possible" that "the gravity All material falling in the universe black hole "is a subjective imagination, not true. and the" upside down "is not a scientific theory because it can set up a" positive ", its" down "is not necessarily established. such as the ruins of collapsed buildings is positive, upside down, stand the ruins of houses which are not necessarily built. In this way, Penrose to a non-fact and made a non-scientific theory of the "big bang" hypothesis is both missing the second, only a double nonsense.


VI Conclusion

"Yu-explosion" at the beginning of arguments, the first third to the universe when there is no reality. And then in science, one with the "Hubble" and "Doppler principle" argument, the second is to use "if repulsion super gravity "argument, the three is" the universe collapse into a black hole "of the" upside down "argument, but unfortunately these three are double nonsense.

There is an issue of the most extensive in the world, "popular science" called <"Time History>>, its subtitle is <" From the Big Bang to Black Holes>>. This shows that the <"Time History>> is" from a nonsense to another double double nonsense. "

References:
[1] CCTV "Discovery" <<The Big Bang>>
[2] <"Time History>> 57 pages, Hunan Science and Technology Press, 2000.

[3] <"Marx and Engels Collected Works>> Vol 20 583.

[4] <"Modern Science and Technology Basics (cadres Optional)>> 85 pages, Science Press, Central Party School Press co-published edition of .1994.

[5] Quoted from <"References News>> May 10, 2006, 7th Edition. Links http://www.hi138.com Research Papers Download