With regard to teaching quality monitoring network to write papers implement _

Papers to write net: Abstract Many colleges and universities in their efforts to build its own teaching quality monitoring system, but there are many problems in the system, need to monitor the team to find solutions to further improve the monitoring system and improving the monitoring team to establish a number of ways, to really implement monitoring .

Keywords teaching Quality Monitoring System

1 quality control problems in teaching
Currently most universities have established teaching quality monitoring system, and for this system to establish a subdirectory, such as chain of command, the target system, evaluation system, organizational systems, information systems, feedback systems, etc. all colleges and universities in teaching quality control this problem up and down a lot of effort, but generally there are still some problems, systems, methods, single, nominal control, teaching quality monitoring failed to implement. For example, many online colleges and universities to establish the student teaching evaluation system, but only open at each end of the semester, students must be evaluated on teaching teachers to teach in order to check the results of this semester or next semester elective for many students eager to see my results, scoring freely to the classroom teacher , there is no entry reviews so the online teaching evaluation meaningful and does not truly reflect the level of teachers and problems.

The monitoring of marking students' work is also part of an easy oversight, especially for the humanities, the job is often writing papers or a book review arrangement. Operations of this nature brought to the teacher's flexibility in marking the face of a large number of operations of the , teachers can "choose" Con read, but also "choose" general and read, skim over, and finally marked with a rough score. and this one is monitoring a loophole in the current teaching. some schools, teachers are required each semester hand in papers and sample archiving, teachers will be able to choose relatively few correcting serious job was turned over to accept the check, while other operations are changed very casual, very "seat of your pants."
2 Construction of scientific teaching quality monitoring system
2.1 improve the teaching quality monitoring system
First to develop a number of effective system to ensure monitoring of rules to follow, such as lectures between teachers system, the required number of lectures based on the section for teachers to each other between the observation and evaluation, will review the record to the lectures, and provision in each semester of teaching and research conference or other meeting on teaching and research and explore each other in addition to positive, but also to propose ways to improve deficiencies and the student's online observation and evaluation systems can not only open in the end, and not as student achievement or elective query in exchange. Online Class Evaluation can open a long time, in addition to scoring, more lectures to encourage students to enter their own experiences and suggestions for teachers so the system can make students feel after listening to a lesson in time reflects out. establish a standardized system of teaching and handling the accident identified, standardized teaching behavior, serious teaching order.

2.2 improve the teaching quality monitoring team
At present, many schools have set up a steering group, which formed by students, teachers, steering group, the monitoring team composed of academic departments, but the team is complete? Really play a supervisory role? As mentioned earlier, students of teaching quality control, mainly through observation and evaluation to be completed online while now since the implementation of a number of schools' student information workers "system, which elected student representatives in each class, the instructor will teach the class on the effects of reflection collected, and regularly reflected to the academic department or the teachers themselves. teachers can also find student information workers to communicate, to understand the idea of ​​students. Academic departments of information by members of the periodic reports of students, classroom teachers can learn the effect of instruction, so as to achieve the purpose of monitoring.

Between teachers, peers through the lectures for the general control of which to play out their own teaching and research functions. The moment of the increasing emphasis on teaching and research university's role, emphasizing the beginning of the semester teaching and research is no longer the kind of sub-classes, the end of the semester cents unit teaching and research In addition to its research function, in teaching monitoring, but also to play its due role in addition to individual lectures, the Department should regularly organize collective lectures, observation and evaluation after the collective. observation and evaluation of the advantages of collective point of view more comprehensive, inspiring each other, but also have more freedom of observation and evaluation platform. In addition, teachers can also be organized among the young, middle-aged teachers, between the observation and evaluation, so that teachers have to absorb the advantages of their peers, are more motivated to self-improvement courses.

The Steering Group is generally composed by experienced teachers. These teachers have extensive teaching experience, teachers can quickly discovered class of problems. School teachers should have the courage of the problems raised, found that teachers have the phenomenon of discipline, said to be timely because of the Steering Group in general by seniority undertake research projects or certain administrative duties as part-time teachers, given the heavy task of these teachers, some of the prestige of high school, experienced a retired teacher invited the Steering Group. This practice is worth learning. Links to free download http: / / www.hi138.com
Academic departments in the teaching role of monitoring on a good monitor is mainly reflected in all aspects of the organization. Formulate monitoring system, the organization monitors the team members to effectively implement these systems.

2.3 Monitoring not a mere formality
Monitoring the quality of teaching many ways and can not really play a monitoring role, but caused a negative effect, increasing the burden on teachers and monitoring teams, such as questions of the examination and approval system, the starting point is the quality of questions in order to pass inspection, monitoring the content of school teachers and students to master knowledge of the situation. questions usually start with Department Director approval, then submitted to the dean in charge of teaching the approval, but often do this step what happened as the students responses, only classroom teachers, I know, even with the questions approval is just a mere formality, and the persons approval form is the responsibility of the papers on the signature column, not really a careful review of the questions. which makes the questions only to "approved" and approval, the "trial" to save the . After the students finished the test, it is rare for its teaching and research and teaching department check again the teacher correcting the elastic scale, knowledge levels of students, did not effectively monitor. Questions reflect the content of school teachers, but also to reflect their mastery of knowledge. Questions of a design, a reflection of the level of teachers to teach. Questions designed low level of harm to students, but also to create more useful work study and review, so this means of monitoring the approval be subject to questions seriously, and Mo flow in form teaching calendar, curriculum review and other there is the same situation, refrain to "batch" and approved. As for the papers after marking, some schools take to save the practice of binding, this approach is acceptable, but the neglect of a problem is that students can not see their answer was correct the situation, can not know what knowledge did not grasp the teacher correcting the situation to students and supervision. We stand and returned the questions after correcting students, for students check their own knowledge of the omissions, to further consolidate the knowledge learned to master. there are questions on the question mark, the teacher can also be further made to the marking, and then after the paper recycling, binding save.

2.4 The emphasis on monitoring the quality of graduates
University qualified personnel for the society, graduates should fit the needs of employers. Monitoring the quality of teaching is often only concerned about the school, the students ignored the post-employment feedback employer employing unit, the community's needs is based on enrollment and school of graduation Health and quality control, including graduates of the regional distribution, industry distribution, remuneration, job promotion, job fitness, income growth and job stability, etc. can not ignore the degree of monitoring of graduates of professional counterparts. In addition, we attach importance to graduate Health personnel training on the part of his alma mater, the feedback from the work of graduates find employment after their lack of capacity and expertise of the defect, to find out the alma mater of the training problems that arise. more depth to the employer, through discussions, interviews , case tracking, surveys and other ways and means for testing the quality of graduates, employers make to improve your Education and teaching ideas and suggestions. to understand the situation after the employment of students, teaching it to adapt to social Development and testing, to adjust the direction of running.

Establish a scientific, systematic, and improve the teaching quality monitoring system, need to monitor the team work together to correct problems promptly, abandon the practice of no practical effect, the monitoring of the letter. Work together to ensure that the monitoring has improved continuously, for teaching, for university Development.


References
[1] Yao Kai and Higher Education management [M]. Wuhan: Huazhong University Press, 2000.

[2] Hou Guangwen Education Evaluation Studies [M]. Zhengzhou: Henan University Press, 1999.

[3] Hu Xiaomin. Supervision of university teaching and teaching quality monitoring system [J]. Higher Education Development and Evaluation, 2005.3.

Links to free download http://www.hi138.com